

|
Combating open society threats: regionalism, nepotism, corruption
Recommendations for NGOs of the Kyrgyz Republic
(here you can find the research paper PDF 136 Kb)
The project was accomplished in October 2007.
The problem encountered by the democratic development, and the state-building in the Kyrgyz Republic is endemic corruption and nepotism generated by the “traditional” social structure (uruuchuluk), which has been transformed by the Soviet rule, but however survived this experience of a social modeling. Nepotism (uruuchuluk) penetrates all levels of the state structure. Deputy factions in the national parliament are mainly formed by the principle of regional affiliation, although they have ideological screens. Illegal access to resources in governmental organizations (custom service, tax police) is also based on the same principle.
During 70 years the Soviet authority had been trying to eradicate the practice of uruuchuluk from the Kyrgyz society. However, they did not achieve much success in this attempt. Fourteen years of Kyrgyz independence pointed out that this problem has not been resolved, but only aggravated. But, is it really necessary to eradicate this social practice? If it still exists it is because it has a utility, because it has a special function that Kyrgyz society probably needs. The utility, which still cannot be provided by the state: social security for example. The objective of the project is to find answer on the questions: - Is there another way to combat the social practice of uruuchuluk? - Is it possible to create state institutions and mechanisms, which would take into consideration this social particularity?
My group advisors
Stephen Kotkin is Professor of European and Asian history at Princeton University, where he also directs the Russian Studies Program. He serves on the Editorial Board and Trustees of Princeton University Press and on the Executive Committee of the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies (PIIRS). Outside Princeton, he serves on the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) Advisory Committee and as a consultant to a number of foundations. He has authored, co-authored, or edited nine books, including Magnetic Mountain (1995), Armageddon Averted (2001), and Political Corruption in Transition: A Handbook (2002). He has been a visiting professor in Russia and Japan, and is the recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship. He writes reviews and essays for The New Yorker, The New York Review of Books, The New York Times, Financial Times, The New Republic, and the TLS. He is also a commentator on the BBC and National Public Radio (NPR). His current project—“Lost in Siberia: Dreamworlds of Eurasia”—is a study of the Ob River basin over the last seven centuries. He earned a PhD and MA from the University of California at Berkeley.
The timeline |
|
|
Period |
Place
|
Activity
|
|
1 |
01 May – 18 June |
Bishkek |
1) Preparation of personal website, revision of the research proposal, timeline and advocacy plan. 2) Creation of network basis for advocacy. |
|
2 |
18 June – 5 August |
Batken, Osh, Jalalabad, |
Fieldwork - completing of available data.
|
|
30 June |
Issue paper
|
||
|
3 |
5 August – 31 September |
Chui, Issykkul, Naryn, Talas, |
Fieldwork - collecting of data, checking up available data.
|
|
1 October |
Draft Policy Study Interim activity report
|
||
|
4 |
1 October – 5 December |
Bishkek |
Checking up collected data, |
|
5 December |
2nd Draft Policy Study Financial year-end report
|
||
|
5 |
5 December – 15 February |
Bishkek |
Writing a final report Advocacy |
|
15 February
|
Final 20 page Policy Study |
||
|
6 |
20 April
|
Final Activity Report |
|