CENTER FOR POLICY STUDIES
INTERNATIONAL POLICY FELLOWSHIPS
NADOR UTCA 11, H-1051 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY (36 1) 327
3863, FAX (36 1) 327 3809
MENTOR CRITIQUE FORM
Your thoughtful and honest appraisal will be most helpful. We appreciate
your input and will try to implement as many of your ideas as possible. Continue
comments on the back if necessary.
Each Fellow works with one mentor who is Soros foundations network-affiliated
(usually Open Society Institute and Central European University) and one
or two ‘external’ mentor(s) who are experts in the field working outside
the Soros foundations network. Mentors should: 1) Work with Fellows to devise
a brief policy paper in their field(s) of expertise based on a lengthy research
paper written over the course of the fellowship year, 2) Maintain contact
with Fellows at least once every six weeks or so by telephone, fax or e-mail
to discuss the development of projects, 3) If feasible, meet with Fellows
at least once during the fellowship year to discuss the project, 4) Facilitate
Fellows’ contact with other relevant experts and participation in appropriate
meetings (IPF has discretionary funds to support Fellow attendance at relevant
events), 5) Complete brief mid-term and final critique forms supplied by
IPF to provide the program with feedback regarding the Fellow’s progress.
Your name, position _Zverev Dmitriy , expert of regional Chamber of Commerce
and Industry ___________________________________________________
Name of Fellow you have assisted __Evgenia Kolomak_______________________
1. What, in your opinion, have you and your Fellow/program/project gained
from your cooperation thus far?
_____________________________________________________________________
1. I suppose I can facilitate Evgenia’s contact with experts in the filed
of regional regulation of economic activity and invite for participation
in seminars and round tables where policy-makers takes part. I am also ready
to consult in preparing policy papers.
___________________________________________________________________
2. I think the project has a good policy component and the results will be
useful in policy making.
_____________________________________________________________________
2. Do certain areas of this Fellow’s work need improvement? Which areas?
1. It would be useful to incorporate into review of literature and into analysis
elements of political cycle.
_____________________________________________________________________
2. The review of literature and list of the stylized are not focused on the
problem of the project, it is necessary to reorganize these parts of the
text.
_____________________________________________________________________
3. In your opinion, does your Fellow’s project make a significant contribution
to the field?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
4. Would the project be important to other countries in the CEE/fSU region?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
5. Could the proposed policy research make an impact on the policy environment
in specific countries or regions? (Policy makers, experts and policy research
community)
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
6. Is the timetable for the project realistic?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
7. Could the project benefit a large number of people?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
8. Does the Fellow show evidence that he/she can think strategically about
the relevant project and/or field?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
9. If the Fellow were to re-apply for continued OSI funding for follow-up
work associated with the project, would you support continued funding?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
10. Are there other appropriate funders that may support the project?
YES - NO
_____________________________________________________________________
I do not know
_____________________________________________________________________
Recommendations for other potential senior contacts for this Fellow:
Additional Comments (Please comment on your Fellow’s work and all aspects
of the IPF program using the back of this sheet):